January 2012

Br. Peter Junipero Hannah, O.P.'s picture

Obedience, Social Justice, and the Mother of God

Filed under: 

What’s wrong with the world?  When this question was sent out by a British newspaper in the early 20th century to noted authors of the time, intending to elicit essay responses, G.K. Chesterton famously gave the most concise response: “Dear Sirs, I am. Sincerely Yours, GKC.”  The remark hits upon a profound truth. <--break-> Take your pick from among the laundry-list of social ills that plague our world: abortion, crime, war, poverty, sexual scandal, political corruption, domestic violence, alcoholism, drug abuse.  Every social ill ultimately has its root in the individual human heart, and without seeking a remedy to this first of all, we are like sailors on a sinking ship continually heaving water off the boat while ignoring the leak.

This is not to say, of course, we should ignore social problems, or neglect putting our energies into shaping a social order that respects justice, human dignity, and the common good.  It is, however, to point out what Chesterton realized, and indeed what recent Popes have pointed out in their social encyclicals: a just social order  necessarily depends on a fundamental conversion of the human heart, both to initiate worthwhile change, and to maintain and preserve it.

 It is most interesting, in this light, that Aquinas reckons the virtue of obedience as part of the cardinal virtue of Justice (ST II.II.104.2).  In our contemporary American culture, we are perhaps not used to thinking of “obedience” as a virtue.  We more naturally, I think, imagine it a necessary but annoying part of certain very limited segments of life: a worker obeying his manager’s wishes on the job; a soldier bound to obey his higher officer; even a pet properly trained to follow the dictates of its owner (it is telling that two out of the four automatically generated Google suggestions for “obedience” pertain to doggy-training!).  Yet Aquinas, articulating a longstanding Christian (and biblical) tradition, sees obedience not only as a virtue necessary to the just maintenance of human society, but pervading all aspects of human interaction.  Why?

 The first part of the answer is fairly straightforward.  Insofar as obedience indicates a certain way of yielding our immediate desires and inclinations to the common good, the obedience we give to civil law ensures that society can function on a day-to-day basis.  Society demands order, and if I thwart that order by stealing something not rightfully mine, the state can justly punish me and demand I recompense the aggrieved party.  So too the “obedience” I give to my employer is a choice I make in full knowledge that if I neglect my duties, the employer can relieve me of my employed status.  Aquinas, though, will say that something more than external conformity to the law is needed to make obedience meritorious.  Charity must inform the practice of obedience, such that we obey “not through fear of punishment, but through love of justice” (ST II.II.104.3).  Justice, moreover, extends beyond the legal and civil order with which we generally associate it.  It extends to obeying religious superiors (“observance”), to obeying parents (“piety”) and above all to obeying God (“religion”).

 As a religious, I can testify (with virtually every other religious I’ve met) that among the three vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience, the last is the most difficult.  Poverty can offer challenges, such as not being able to travel as readily or obtain the worldly comforts many people today enjoy.  But in our consumerist world this sort of life is somewhat refreshing and attractive.  Chastity has its demands as well, though my experience is that fidelity to one’s prayer life and closeness to the sacraments protects and sustains the heart and mind in this regard.  Obedience, though, cuts to the heart of what it means to be a human being, or more specifically what it means to be a son of Adam.

 Each of us clings desperately to our own will, and not without reason.  Our free will, among all the goods we possess, is perhaps the most cherished and intimate part of ourselves.  It is the center of our moral action and all our behavior.  It is the faculty we have, as a gift from God, to carry out day-to-day tasks, from the minutest to the greatest.  It is where thought, memory, experience and desire all unite into concrete decisions about how we are to live.  As we know, though, the more valuable and sacred a thing is, the more drastic and destructive can be its effects when misused.  Scripture and history eloquently and relentlessly narrate the abuses that arise from a disordered human heart that is bent on “having its way.”  So, too, in our own personal lives each of us experiences the weakness of our human will with its faults and inclinations to sin, even in spite of our best intentions.

 The vow of obedience in religious life, therefore, is partially meant as a kind of school of discipline to remedy this natural inclination to selfishness and pride.  All Christians in virtue of our baptism are called to self-renunciation for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven (Mt 16:24).  But in making the vow of obedience in religious life, one is in essence saying, “My life is not my own. I put it entirely at the service of God and His Church as God reveals His will to me through my superiors.”  The rub comes when we are called to do things for God and His Church at the command of his sometimes very weak and fallible human instruments.  Thus charity enters in.  Unless a superior demands something that is contrary to God’s law and thus violates conscience (in which case one is actually bound to disobey), the practice of obedience hones us in charity.  I happened to have been blessed with very good superiors thus far in my Dominican life, but whether one enjoys this situation or not, in either case obedience impels the religious to put aside his own will, put himself at the disposal of another, and (above all) trust that “in everything God works for good”(Rom 8:28).  In doing so, we imitate in some small way the One who became “obedient, even unto death, death on a Cross”(Philip 2:4).

 There is even a freeing aspect to such a vow.  The central Dominican mission is to preach for the salvation of souls.  We cultivate a life of prayer, study, and contemplation precisely for this end.  Taking a vow of obedience in a sense frees one of the burden of always thinking and wondering and planning where he is going to be in the next year, the next month, even the next week.  If the Order calls, we go.  If there are souls in a particular place, then, well, the gospel needs to be preached there, whether I in my own cleverness had thought of the possibility or not.  One must be ready, of course, for bearing a certain burden, and for facing up to and enduring perhaps very demanding ministries and missions.  But in all things, God’s is the glory and we put ourselves entirely at the service of His desires as they come to us through the Order to which we are vowed.

 With the Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God, upon us at the outset of this new calendar year, we may look to Mary as an icon of that perfect obedience to the Father’s will which we are all called to imitate.  Unhesitating, total, undaunted, willing even to endure misunderstanding and suffering, Mary’s obedience to the Father’s will is the model for all religious.  Mary could have had no idea what she was getting into when she uttered her Fiat, but she trusted that her Father would provide, whatever circumstances arose.  It is this kind of loving obedience to the Father that is the cure for our fallen nature’s more destructive tendencies, tendencies that will last as long as we dwell within this mortal coil.  We do well to continue heaving as much water out of the ship of human affairs as we can, though each of us must be especially attentive to that primordial leak which only grace informing our will by charity can plug.  Mary, Mother of God, Ora pro nobis!

Br. Chris Brannan, O.P.'s picture

"Ordinary" Time and the Common Life

Filed under: 

Ordinary Time -- Green vestmentsOn Tuesday we began returning to St. Albert's after our two-week Christmas vacation. Like most of the students, I spent much of this vacation by being with family and catching up with friends. Coincidentally, we were away from the priory for most of Christmas season proper, and have now returned at the beginning of "Ordinary" time in the liturgical calendar — a change any Catholic who has attended mass since Tuesday could not fail to notice. But what is "Ordinary time" anyway, and why is it "Ordinary"?

As it turns out, what we call "Ordinary" time is the English name given to the Latin term tempus per annum—"Time through the year"—which applies to those weeks outside of the Advent, Christmas, Lent, and Easter seasons, and which are numbered sequentially (1st week, 2nd week, etc). "Ordinary", then, means "ordered" or "numbered", and not "normal" or "dull". We have begun the first "numbered" week of the liturgical year now that Advent and Christmas are officially over, and that is what is meant by the "first week in Ordinary time."

I suppose that it is fitting that the first week in Ordinary time—for us student brothers—marks the beginning of our next semester of formation. We are, in a sense, resuming to our "ordinary" life as religious by returning to our Dominican community and resuming our common life with the rest of the friars, a life in which our day is punctuated by prayer and meals together. We might say that it is now the first week of our "ordinary" schedule in which the different intervals of the day are "ordered" by the hours of prayer: Matins and Lauds in the morning, Rosary and Midday prayer at noon, Vespers and mass in the early evening, and finally Compline.

This schedule of communal prayer, after all, is central to the Dominican life and vocation: we are united as a community by our daily prayers together, a prayer which provides the context for our own personal prayer and which sustains our spiritual life, our studies, and our preaching ministry. To have each day punctuated by such common prayer is quite "ordinary" for a Dominican, and is one of my favorite aspects of the Dominican experience. We live, pray, and worship together as a community of friars, that we might be led to God in contemplation, that from this contemplation we might be inspired to the task of holy preaching for the salvation of souls.

As we begin "Ordinary" time, then, let us commit ourselves—in whatever state in life—to let our mornings and evenings be "ordered" by our daily prayer, that together we might center each day on Christ, so that what may otherwise appear merely "ordinary" might become "extraordinary" by His grace.

Br. Michael James Rivera, O.P.'s picture

What's in a Name?

Filed under: 

“After eight days had passed, it was time to circumcise the child; and he was called Jesus, the name given by the angel before he was conceived in the womb.” --Luke 2:21

Earlier this month our province celebrated its titular feast, that of the Most Holy Name of Jesus. Since the universal church observes this day as an optional memorial on January 3, many of the student brothers (who are typically visiting their families for the Christmas break) have never celebrated this day with a Dominican community. This year, however, I had the honor of observing the feast with our community in Salt Lake City. After Mass, while meditating on the Gospel and Fr. Carl’s homily, I was briefly caught up in a memory.

As a child in CCD, I remember being taught to bow my head at the mention of the name of Jesus, the Blessed Virgin Mary, or any of my patron saints. Like memorizing the “Our Father” or the “Hail Mary” or the proper parts of the Mass, this was just another part of our weekly routine. Nowadays it seems as if this practice is no longer the norm. It’s rare to see people bow during the profession of the Nicene Creed at the words “and by the Holy Spirit was incarnate of the Virgin Mary and became man,” yet alone incline their heads at the mention of the name of Jesus. In the last few weeks I’ve begun to reflect on why this might be, and my answer is William Shakespeare.

In that oh-so-famous balcony scene, we hear the following words on the lips of young Juliet as she pines for her beloved Romeo:

P1000366.JPG

'Tis but thy name that is my enemy; / Thou art thyself, though not a Montague. / What's Montague? it is nor hand, nor foot, / Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part / Belonging to a man. O, be some other name!
What's in a name? that which we call a rose / By any other name would smell as sweet; / So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call'd, / Retain that dear perfection which he owes / Without that title. Romeo, doff thy name, / And for that name which is no part of thee / Take all myself.

Juliet would lead us to believe that words, especially names, aren’t important. Romeo would still be who he is, even if he were not called Romeo, and a rose would still smell as sweet, even if it was called something else. It’s rather interesting that Shakespeare, who is considered one of the greatest playwrights and a master of words, would have one of his characters say such a thing. Thus some scholars have suggested that the words are meant to be dismissed as the overly-dramatic prose of a teenager in love. Still, I cannot but help to find some truth in Juliet’s logic. A person’s name is not the very core of who they are; it does not reveal everything about them.

On the other hand, it is how we as human beings describe the whole of a person in all the ways in which we know them. And so it is with the name of Jesus. When we call upon the name of Jesus, we bring to mind, with one word, all that we understand Jesus to be; everything we have learned about him throughout the years, and every experience and encounter of his presence in our lives. With that in mind, I now realize why I was taught to bow my head in prayer at the name of Jesus, and why our province honors this name every time we preach and fulfill our mission to the world.   

Categories: 
Br. Bradley Thomas Elliott, O.P.'s picture

Proud to Be a Dominican

Filed under: 

Br. Brad's first vows.

Presently, I have completed the first semester of my first year as a student Brother at St. Albert’s priory, last year being my novitiate year. It is hard for me to believe that a year and a half has past since I entered the order. This has only recently come to the forefront of my consciousness due to the home visit that I and the other student friars just enjoyed. Every year, after the Christmas day liturgies are through and the academic term is fully at rest, the brothers are afforded two weeks to leave the nest of the studentate and visit family and maintain established relationships with friends. But this being my first year in vows, it had been over a year since I had seen my family, and the visit provided for me an opportunity for reflection that I have not had since entering the order.

I have titled this entry, “Proud to be a Dominican”, since this was precisely the blessing of the visit. I had forgotten, in the day-to-day humdrum of academics, how blessed I am to be here at St. Albert's Priory and how proud I am to be in the Dominican Order. But first, what could this sense of “pride” mean? Isn’t that somewhat oxymoronic? Isn’t the religious life supposed to be a school of humility? Isn’t saying “proud to be a Dominican” like saying “proud humility” or “humble pride”? No, I do not think it is. Once again the sword of good Thomistic training must be pulled from its sheath and the correct distinctions must be made.

A man can be proud because he is enamored with himself, focused exclusively on his own goodness and blush at the thought of his own great deeds. This pride is largely self-focused. Certainly, in the past, I have felt this way about many of my accomplishments; I would be suspicious of anyone who claimed that they had not. But this is not the good pride that I am talking about here and it is precisely because I have succumbed to this self-focused pride in the past that I now clearly see the distinction. Indeed, the two experiences, one of the self-focused pride and the other of the good pride, are wholly opposed to each other.

When a man claims to be proud of his family, proud of his alma mater, proud of his country or proud of his church, he is speaking of a pride that is not self-focused but focused on another. Indeed he feels a sense of greatness, but it is not a sense of his own greatness; it is a sense of being a part of something greater than himself; it is the greatness of the other that swells his heart. This is a pride that draws a man out of himself and towards something great. Since he is focused on an ideal, a goal, or a vision that is beyond him, he is called by this pride to do greater things, more virtuous things, and more courageous things, things that he otherwise would never be inspired to do of it was not for this pride. This is precisely the pride that I feel about being in the Dominican Order. I am part of an order that is older than I, larger than I; its mission, to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ, existed long before I was born and will continue long after I die. I am both proud and humbled to be a part of something so great.

This is what St. Thomas Aquinas calls the virtue of Magnanimity and it is indeed a long forgotten virtue in our time. I was reminded, after reflecting on this experience, of the words of Joseph Pieper describing this virtue:

“Magnanimity, a much-forgotten virtue, is the aspiration of the spirit to great things, extensio ad magna. A person is magnanimous if he has the courage to seek what is great and becomes worthy of it. This virtue has its roots in a firm confidence in the highest possibilities of that human nature that God did "marvelously ennoble and has still more marvelously renewed" (Roman Missal). Thus magnanimity incorporates into itself the aspiration of natural hope and stamps it according to the truth of man's own nature. Magnanimity, as both Thomas and Aristotle tell us, is "the jewel of all the virtues", since it always-- and particularly in ethical matters-- decides in favor of what is, at any given moment, the greater possibility of the human potentiality for being.”      Josef Pieper, On Hope (Ignatius Press, 1986 [1977]), p. 28.  

To come back to an earlier question, is saying, “I am proud to be a religious” a contradiction like saying “proud humility” or “humble pride”? No, it is not a contradiction at all. There IS indeed a type of pride that a man can feel and grow in humility at the same time, this is precisely the “humble pride” that I felt during my home visit when I was overwhelmed by gratitude in the face of the sheer awesomeness of God’s call, that He would call me, insignificant man that I am, to be part of something as great as the “holy preaching” of the Dominican order.

I pray that my brothers and I can live up to such a great call. Since we are each a part of something so much greater than ourselves, we need each other; we cannot live up to this call on our own. All Dominican Saints… pray for us.

Categories: 
Br. Chris Brannan, O.P.'s picture

West Coast Walk for Life 2012

Filed under: 

Last Saturday, January 21, we participated in the 8th annual West Coast Walk for Life in San Francisco. In the morning, over two thousand Catholics gathered at the Cathedral for mass presided by Archbishop Niederauer at 9:30am. Around ten other bishops, dozens of priests and religious, and hundreds of lay people participated. After mass, we made our way to City Hall, in front of which about 50,000 people from around the state and country gathered for the pre-walk rally.

This was a change from previous years, in which the walk normally began at Justin Herman Plaza, and ended on Marina green. Apparently, an abortion-rights group held an event on Justin Herman Plaza at the same time as our rally began; they had about 100 people show up. All for the better: the City Hall area was much more conducive to our large gathering, and the walk down Market Street (which was blocked off for our use) gave the entire group a more prominent presence and unity, and a new sort of energy, than in previous years. 

Friars walking to CathedralAll in all, this year's Walk for Life was an important way to make a stand for the dignity of human life, and served as reminder -- to the city and the media -- that the Pro-Life movement is not some small fringe, radical phenomena that will perish in irrelevance. DSPT Sign and Friars on WalkEvery year the numbers seem to grow, and the media, more so than in years past, paid attention this year. We pray that such an event, and other aspects of the pro-life movement, may indeed help foster a genuine culture of life in our country, and that all of those who believe in the Gospel of Life may give faithful witness to it by word and deed.

More info, photos, and media coverage updates on the Walk for Life West Coast 2012 can be found at the Walk for Life Media Blog.

Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us.

Categories: